Authored on the web:
Desk dos. For males, level of music analysed is given because final number together with directory of audio analysed for each individual into the supports. For men, quantity of colony internet equivalent what number of men filed, for females, it is short for what amount of nests at which we noticed him or her. Male sound characteristics was basically averaged to your private height prior to figuring this new demonstrated analysis. Indicate ± SD | Median is offered towards amount of pulses for every single sound, period, heartbeat and you will prominent frequency
Figure 3. Numerous pulse songs created by the latest corkwing wrasse. Wave form (top) and you may related spectrogram (below). (a) Grunt out of a good territorial men corkwing wrasse. (b) Strong grunt out-of a beneficial territorial men corkwing wrasse. (c) Grunt out-of a lady corkwing wrasse. Spectrogram configurations: fifty dB active diversity, Hamming windows (raised sine-squared), 0.008 s window length (male and female grunt), 0.08 s screen size (male deep grunt)
Profile step 3. Multiple heartbeat tunes developed by the fresh corkwing wrasse. Wave form (top) and involved spectrogram (below). (a) Grunt regarding a good territorial men corkwing wrasse. (b) Deep grunt away from an excellent territorial male corkwing wrasse. (c) Grunt of a female corkwing wrasse. Spectrogram setup: fifty dB vibrant range, Hamming window (increased sine-squared), 0.008 s window size (male and female grunt), 0.08 s window duration (men strong grunt)
Because of the different structure of grunts and deep grunts, we only compared the sound properties statistically, which were the same in both types of grunt, i.e. dominant frequency and duration. The two male grunt types differ significantly from each other in both propertiespared to deep grunts, male grunts are of a shorter duration (t-test: t = 5.44, P < 0.00step step 1, CI = ?0.47–1.09). The dominant frequency is higher in male grunts than in male deep grunts (Mann Whitney U test: W = 0, N1 = 17, N2 = 11, P < 0.001). Table 2 presents all measured sound properties for comparison.
Compared to male grunts, female grunts had a significantly lower pulse-rate (t-test: t = -6.71, P < 0.0001, CI = — -). Grunts of males and females had a similar dominant frequency (t-test: t = 1.38, P = 0.17, CI = -0.05- 0.26), duration (t-test: t = 0.47, P = 0.64, CI = -0.19- 0.26), and number of pulses (Mann Whitney U test: W = 302, N1 = 17, N2 = 35, P = 0.94).
Your choice of obviously assignable presses triggered the research of 102 male ticks out-of 31 videos from 19 anyone and 66 lady presses out-of 20 video clips from the nests from fourteen guys. Your choice of obviously assignable plops led to the research away from 73 male plops of 28 videos out-of 18 clips and you will 66 women plops out of 21 video clips at the nests out of 14 boys. Averaging male audio for each and every private men triggered a sample sized letter = 18 having ticks, and you may n = 17 for plops.
Clicks are sharp, single-pulse broadband sounds with their main energy in a frequency range of several hundred Hz, while the sound pressure level difference across the harmonics are her datingprofielvoorbeelden small (Figure 4(a), Table 3). The dominant frequency of clicks was significantly higher in males than in females (Mann Whitney U test: W = 409, N1 = 35, N2 = 66, P = 0.04). However, there were some female clicks for which the dominant frequency was much higher than in most clicks (up to 7200 Hz). We did not see any technical reason to exclude these outliers from the analysis. Clicks did not differ between males and females in the sound pressure level difference between dominant frequency and its 5 th harmonic (t-test: t48.cuatro = 0.84, P = 0.40, CI = ?2.17–5.31).
Geef een reactie